IRAN-UNITED STATES CLAIMS TRIBUNAL
دیوان داوری دعاوی ایران - ایالات متحده
Homeکتابشناسی

کتابشناسی

فهرست منابع

کتاب‌ها و فصول قابل توجه در آثار مشترک

  • M. Aghahosseini, The Claims of Dual Nationals and the Development of Customary International Law. Issues Before the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (2007)
  • G. Aksen, The Iran-US Claims Tribunal and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules – an early comment, in: Art of Arbitration, 1-26, (J.C. Schultsz, A.J. van den Berg, eds. 1982)
  • G.H. Aldrich, The Jurisprudence of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: An Analysis of the Decisions of the Tribunal (1996)
  • C.F. Amerasinghe, Evidence in International Litigation (2005)
  • C.F. Amerasinghe, International Arbitral Jurisdiction: The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (2011)
  • S.H. Amin, The Legal System of Iran, in: Modern Legal Systems Cyclopedia, 5.80.3-5.80.17 (K.R. Redden, ed. 1990)
  • G. Arangio Ruiz, State Fault and the Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility: Questions of Attribution and Relevance, in: Le droit international au service de la paix, de la justice et du développement, 25-44 (1991)
  • A.B. Avanessian, Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal in Action (Seven Years of Arbitration) (1991-1993)
  • S.A. Baker & M.D. Davis, The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules in Practice – The Experience of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (1992)
  • C. Binder et al., International investment law for the 21st century, essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer (2009)
  • K.-H. Böckstiegel, The Legal Rules Applicable in International Commercial Arbitration Involving States or State Controlled Enterprises, in: 60 Years of I.C.C. Arbitration: A Look at the Future, 117 (1984)
  • K.-H. Böckstiegel, Zur Auslegung völkerrechtlicher Verträge durch das Iran United States Claims Tribunal [On the Interpretation of International Treaties by the Iran United States Claims Tribunal], in: Staat und Völkerrechtsordnung, 119-131 (K. Hailbronner, G. Ress, T. Stein, eds. 1989) (Ger.)
  • K.-H. Böckstiegel, Zur Praxis der internationalen Streiterledigung. Überlegungen am Ende der Tätigkeit als Präsident des Iran-United States Claims Tribunal [On the Practice of International Dispute Settlement: Reflections at the End of My Tenure as President of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal], in: Völkerrecht, Europarecht und Verfassungsrecht, 7-25 (G. Ress, M.R. Will, eds. 1989) (Ger.)
  • K.-H. Böckstiegel, Der Durchgriff auf den Staat bei Verträgen im internationalen Wirtschaftsverkehr [Piercing the state’s veil in the law of international contracts], in: Völkerrecht, Recht der Internationalen Organisationen, Weltwirtschaftsrecht, 17-33 (K.-H. Böckstiegel et al., eds. 1989) (Ger.)
  • K.-H Böckstiegel, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: a unique example of arbitrating for peace, in: Arbitrating for Peace: How Arbitration Made a Difference, 91-102 (U. Franke, A. Magnusson, J. Dahlquist, eds. 2016)
  • C.N. Brower & J.D. Brueschke, The Iran-United-States Claims Tribunal (1998)
  • P. Cameron, International Energy Investment Law: The Pursuit of Stability (2010)
  • T.E. Carbonneau, The Elaboration of Substantive Legal Norms and Arbitral Adjudication: The Case of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, in: Iran-United States Claims Tribunal 1981-1983 [Seventh Sokol Colloquium], 104-128 (R.B. Lillich, ed. 1984)
  • D.D. Caron, The Basis of Responsibility: Attribution and Other Trans-Substantive Rules, in: The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Its Contribution to the Law of State Responsibility (R.B. Lillich and D.B. Magraw, eds. 1998)
  • D.D. Caron & J.R. Crook (eds.), The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal and the Process of International Claims Resolution: A Study by the Panel on State Responsibility of the American Society of International Law (2000)
  • D.D. Caron, The Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal and Investment Arbitration: Understanding the Claims Settlement Declaration as a Retrospective BIT, in: The Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal at 25: The Cases Everyone Needs to Know for Investor-State & International Arbitration, Chapter 10 (C.R. Drahozal, C.S. Gibson, eds. 2007)
  • B.M. Clagett, The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal: A Practitioner’s Perspective in Iran-United States Claims Tribunal 1981-1983 [Seventh Sokol Colloquium], 129-135 (R.B. Lillich, ed. 1984)
  • I. Dore, The UNCITRAL framework for arbitration in contemporary perspective (1993)
  • C.R. Drahozal & C.S. Gibson (eds.), The Iran-United-States Claims Tribunal at 25: The Cases Everyone Needs to Know for Investor State & International Arbitration (2007)
  • M.B. Feldman, Implementation of the Iranian Claims Settlement Agreements Status, Issues, and Lessons: View from the Government’s Perspective, in: Private Investors Abroad – Problems and Solutions in International Business, 75-101 (M.L. Landwehr, ed. 1981)
  • H.E. Folz, Bemerkungen zur völkerrechtlichen Beurteilung der Vorgänge um die amerikanischen Geiseln im Iran [Remarks on the International Law Assessment of the Events Surrounding the American Hostages in Iran, in: Staatsrecht-Völkerrecht-Europarecht Festschrift für Hans-Jürgen Schlochauer, 271-288 (I. von Münch, ed. 1981)
  • S. Freidberg, The Iran-United States claims settlement process (1981)
  • C. Giorgetti (ed.), The rules, practice, and jurisprudence of international courts and tribunals (International litigation in practice, Vol. 4) (2012)
  • Götz et al., The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal in the Hague: some reflections on a unique institution of international dispute settlement moving towards the end of its work, in: Liber amicorum Günther Jaenicke zum 85. Geburtstag, 221-238 (V. Gӧtz, P. Selmer, R. Wolfrum, eds. 1998)
  • C.D. Gray, Judicial Remedies in International Law (1987)
  • M.F. Hertz, The Hostage Crisis and Domestic Litigation: An Overview in Iran-United States Claims Tribunal 1981-1983 [Seventh Sokol Colloquium], 136-156 (R.B. Lillich, ed. 1984)
  • J.E. Hoffman, Jr., The Iranian Assets Litigation, in: Private Investors Abroad – Problems and Solutions in International Business, 367-378 (M.L. Landwehr, ed. 1980)
  • H.M. Holtzmann, Some Lessons of the Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal, in: Private Investors Abroad – Problems and Solutions in International Business, 16-1 – 16-29 (J.R. Moss, ed. 1987)
  • H.M. Holtzmann & E. Kristjánsdóttir, International mass claims processes: legal and practical perspectives (2007)
  • N. Horn, Securing International Commercial Transactions: Standby Letters of Credit, Bonds, Guarantees and Similar Sureties, in: The Transnational Law of International Commercial Transactions, 275 – ۳۰۳ (N. Horn & C. Schmitthoff, eds. 1982) 
  • A. Johnson, Skiljedomens ädla konst. Gunnar Lagergren. Internationell domare för handel, fred och mänskliga rättigheter (2017) (Swed.)
  • D.L. Jones, The Iran United States Claims Tribunal: Private Rights and State Responsibility in Iran-United States Claims Tribunal 1981-1983 [Seventh Sokol Colloquium], 51-76 (R.B. Lillich, ed. 1984)
  • S.K. Khalilian, The Law of International Arbitration: A Jurisprudential Study on the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (2003)
  • R. Khan, The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal Controversies, Cases and Contribution (1990)
  • H. Kronke, Internationales Beweisrecht in der Praxis des Iran-United States Tribunals [The International Law on Evidence in the Practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal], in: Zwischenbilanz – Festschrift für Dagmar Coester-Waltjen zum 70. Geburtstag, 509-519 (D. Jakob, G. Mäsch, C. Schmidt, K. Helbig-Lugani, eds. 2015) (Ger.)
  • H. Kronke, Standard of Proof in International Arbitration: Principles, Contingencies and Practice, in: Ius vivum: Kunst – Internationales – Persönlichkeit – Festschrift für Haimo Schack zum 70. Geburtstag, 687-696 (S. Kubis, K. – N. Peifer, B. Raue & M. Stieper, eds. 2022)
  • G. Lagergren, Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal, in: Realism in Law-Making, 113-130 (A. Bos, H. Siblesz, eds. 1986)
  • O. Lando, Arbitral Tribunals and International Conventions, Rules and Model Laws, in: Essays on International Commercial Arbitration, 129-159 (P. Šarčević, ed. 1989)
  • E. Lauterpacht, The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal ‑ An Assessment, in: Private Investors Abroad Problems and Solutions in International Business, 213-228 (M.L. Landwehr, ed. 1982)
  • E. Lauterpacht, Aspects of the Administration of International Justice (1991)
  • R.B. Lillich, Interest in the Law of International Claims, in: Essays in Honor of Voitto Saario and Torvo Sainio, Publications of the Finnish Branch of the International Law Association, 52-60 (1983)
  • R.B. Lillich, Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal 1981-1983 [Seventh Sokol Colloquium], (R.B. Lillich, ed. 1984)
  • R.B. Lillich, Fact-finding before international tribunals [Eleventh Sokol Colloquium] (1992)
  • R.B. Lillich et al., The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Its contribution to the law of state responsibility (1998)
  • S. López Escarcena, Indirect expropriation in international law (2014)
  • A.F. Lowenfeld, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: An Interim Appraisal in Iran- United States Claims Tribunal 1981-1983 [Seventh Sokol Colloquium], 77-91 (R.B. Lillich, ed. 1984)
  • F. Mádl, Competence of Arbitral Tribunal in International Commercial Arbitration, in: Essays on International Commercial Arbitration, 92-112 (P. Šarčević, ed. 1989)
  • N. Mangård, The Hostage Crisis, The Algiers Accords and the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, in: Festskrift till Lars Hjerner Studies in International Law, 363-418 (1990)
  • F.A. Mann, About the Proper Law of Contracts Between States, in: Studies in International Law, 241–۲۵۵ (F.A. Mann, ed. 1973).
  • W. Mapp, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: the first ten years, 1981-1991: an assessment of the Tribunal’s jurisprudence and its contribution to international arbitration (1993)
  • A.J. Menaker, The enduring relevance of the expropriation jurisprudence of the Iran-U.S claims tribunal for investor-state arbitrations, in: The Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal at 25: The Cases Everyone Needs to Know for Investor-State & International Arbitration, 335-374 (by C.R. Drahozal, C.S. Gibson, eds. 2007)
  • B. McGarry, Enforcement of Investment Court Decisions under the New York Convention: A Search for Defining Elements, in: The Investor-State Dispute Settlement System: Reform, Replace or Status Quo?, 451-472 (A.M. Anderson, B. Beaumont, eds. 2020)
  • M. Mohebi, The International Law Character of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (1999)
  • R.M. Mosk, The role of facts in international dispute resolution, in: Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de La Haye, Vol. 304, 9-179 (2003)
  • A. Mouri, The International Law of Expropriation as reflected in the work of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal (1994)
  • K. Oellers-Frahm & N. Wühler, Settlement of the Hostage Crisis (Iran/United States), in: Dispute Settlement in Public International Law, 866-893 (K. Oellers-Frahm, A. Zimmerman, eds. 1984)
  • R.B. Owen, The Blocking of Iranian Assets-Some Legal Implications in the United States and Abroad, 367-378, (M.L. Landwehr, ed. 1980)
  • M. Pellonpää, Rights of Aliens Under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Publications of the Finnish Branch of the International Law Association, 70-80 (1983)
  • M. Pellonpää & D.D. Caron, The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as Interpreted and applied Selected Problems in Light of the Practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (1994)
  • C.W. Pinto, Social Discipline and the Multinational Enterprise, in: International Bar Association Series. Energy Law ’90, 483-541 (1990)
  • R.A. Raad, Les mesures de dépossession en droit international public: étude de la jurisprudence du tribunal irano-américain de réclamations [Expropriation Measures in Public International Law – Examination of the Jurisprudence of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal] (2004) (Fr.)
  • F. Rigaux, Examen de la détermination du droit applicable aux relations précontractuelles [Examination of the Determination of the Law Applicable to pre-Contractual Relations], 121-155 (International Chamber of Commerce, ed. 1990)
  • M. Rubino-Sammartano, Arbitration under the Algiers Declaration (The Iran US Claims Tribunal), in: International Arbitration Law, ۶۵-۸۶ (۱۹۹۰)
  • O. Schachter, The Question of Expropriation/Compensation in the United Nations Code in the Light of Recent State Policy and Practice, Symposium of UN Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations (1989)
  • E.F. Schaffer & R.J. Snyder, Contemporary practice of public international law (1997)
  • S.M. Schwebel, International Arbitration: Three Salient Problems (1987)
  • S.M. Schwebel, Commentary on Social Discipline and the Multinational Enterprise and Security of Investment Abroad, in: International Bar Association Series, Energy Law ’90, 542-548 (1990)
  • J.K. Sharpe, Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, in: The Rules, Practice, and Jurisprudence of International Courts and Tribunals, Vol. 4, 545-573 (C. Georgetti, ed. 2012)
  • K. Skubiszewski, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, in: Liber Amoricum in Memoriam of Judge José Maria Ruda, 265 (C.A. Armas Barea et al. eds. 2000)
  • L.B. Sohn, The Iran United States Claims Tribunal: Jurisprudential Contributions to the Development of International Law, in: Iran-United States Claims Tribunal 1981-1983 [Seventh Sokol Colloquium], 92-103 (R.B. Lillich, ed. 1984)
  • B. Stern & M.-F. Labouz (eds.), Le Tribunal des différends irano-américains (1984) (Fr.)
  • D.P. Stewart, The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal: Accomplishments and Prospects, in: Private Investors Abroad – Problems and Solutions in International Business, 525-560 (J.R. Moss, ed. 1984)
  • D.P. Stewart & L.B. Sherman, Developments at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: 1981-1983, in: Iran-United States Claims Tribunal 1981-1983 [Seventh Sokol Colloquium], 1-50 (R.B. Lillich, ed. 1984)
  • D.P. Stewart & L.B. Sherman, The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal (A) in General, in: Modern Legal Systems Cyclopedia, 5.90.3-5.90.40 (K.R. Redden, ed. 1990)
  • S.J. Toope, The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal: Its Role and Contribution to the Theory and Practice of International Arbitration, in: Mixed International Arbitration, 343-383 (1990)
  • P.D. Trooboff, Implementation of the Iranian Settlement Agreements Status, Issues, and Lessons: View from the Private Sector’s Perspective, in: Private Investors Abroad – Problems and Solutions in International Business, 103-155 (M.L. Landwehr, ed. 1981)
  • U.N. Centre on Transnational Corporation, Financial and Fiscal Aspects of Petroleum Exploitation, Series B No. 3 UNCTC Advisory Studies (1987)
  • J.J. van Hof, Commentary on the UNCITRAL arbitration rules: the application by the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal (1991)
  • H. van Houtte, Revision of Awards Revisited, in: Grenzen überwinden, Prinzipien bewahren – Festschrift für Bernd von Hoffmann zum 70. Geburtstag, 987-995 (H. Kronke, K. Thorn, eds. 2011)
  • H. van Houtte & B. Concolino, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal and its contribution to international law, in: The contribution of international and supranational courts to the rule of law, 303-325 (G. De Baere, J. Wouters, eds. 2015)
  • V. van Houtte-van Poppel, Theory and Practice: The Iran-United States Tribunal and Revision of Awards. A Comment on Islamic Republic of Iran and United States of America, Decision No DEC 134-A3/A8/A9/A14/B61-FT, in: The Practice of Arbitration – Essays in Honour of Hans van Houtte, 203-210 (P. Wautelet, T. Kruger, G. Coppens, eds. 2012)
  • P.J. van Krieken & D. McKay, The Hague: legal capital of the world (2005)
  • C.C.A. Voskuil & J.A. Freedberg-Swartzburg, Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal, in: Essays on International Commercial Arbitration, 64-91 (P. Šarčević, ed. 1989)
  • N. Wühler, Zur Bedeutung des Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal für die Rechtsfortbildung [On the Importance of the Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal for the Development of the Law], 93-125 (K. H. Böckstiegel, ed. 1989) (Ger.)
  • N. Yassari, Iran, in: Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts, 507-519 (D. Girsberger, T. Kadner-Graziano, J.L. Neels eds. 2021)
  • H.S. Zakariya, Changed Circumstances and the Continued Validity of Mineral Development Contracts, in: Legal Aspects of the New International Economic Order, 274 (1980)

مقالات

  • M.H. Abedian Kalkhoran, Revision of Arbitral Awards: Inherent Authority of An Arbitral Tribunal to Revise its Award – A Reflection on the Jurisprudence of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, Iranian Yearbook of Arbitration, 155-208, Shahr-e Danesh Institute of Legal Research, 2017 (Far.)
  • M. Aghahosseini & Z. Moussavi, The claims of dual nationals before the Iran- United States Claims Tribunal: some reflections, 10 Leiden J. Int’l L., 21-47 (1997)
  • M. Aghahosseini, Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal: introductory note, 2 Y.B. Int’l L. & Juris., 1371-1381 (2002)
  • M. Aghahosseini & H. Piran, Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 6 Y.B. Int’l L. & Juris., 1433-1445 (2006)
  • M. Aghahosseini & Z. Mousavi, The burden and standard of proof in the case law of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, Y.B. Int’l L. & Juris., 1579-1588 (2008)
  • A. Ahmadi Vastani, A Brief Discussion of the Algiers Declarations, Legal Bull. Bureau Int’l Legal S. I.R.I. no. 1, Winter 1984-1985
  • B. Akhlaqi, Negotiable Instruments in International Commercial Law, from the Perspective of the 1930 Geneva Convention, 12 Legal Bulletin of the Bureau for International Legal Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1990) (Far.)
  • B. Akhlaqi, Cheques in International Trade Law, 13 Legal Bulletin of the Bureau for International Legal Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1990) (Far.)
  • G.H. Aldrich, What Constitutes a Compensable Taking of Property? The Decisions of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 88 Am. J. Int’l L., 585-610 (1994)
  • N.A. Almasi, The Determination of Nationality and Domicile, from the Perspective of the Conflict of Laws, 12 Legal Bulletin of the Bureau for International Legal Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1990) (Far.)
  • A. Asgarkhani, Compromise and Cooperation at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 19 Arb. Int’l, 149-178 (2003)
  • B. Audit, Les “Accords” d’Alger du 19 janvier 1981 tendant au règlement des différends entre les Etats-Unis et l’Iran [The “Agreements” of Algiers of January 19, 1981 on the settlement of disputes between the United States and Iran], 108 Journal du Droit International (JDI), 713-787 (1981) (Fr.)
  • B. Audit, Le Tribunal des différends irano-américains (1981-1984) [The Iranian – American Claims Tribunal (1981-1984)], 4 Journal du Droit International (JDI), 791-863 (1985) (Fr.)
  • A.B. Avanessian, The New York Convention and Denationalised Arbitral Awards (With Emphasis on the Iran United States Claims Tribunal), 8 J. Int’l Arb., 5-29 (1991)
  • B.I.L.S., The Responsibility of States as a Result of the Act of Individuals, 13 Legal Bulletin of the Bureau for International Legal Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1990) (Far.)
  • S.S. Badaruddin, Choice of Law Decisions in the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, 4 Emory Int’l L. Rev., 157-184 (1990)
  • H. Bainbridge, Recent Developments, Nationalizations, Standard of Compensation American International Group Inc. AWD 93-2-3, 19 December 1983, 24 Va. J. Int’l L., 993-1012 (1984)
  • S.A. Baker & M.D. Davis, Arbitral Proceedings Under the UNCITRAL Rules – The Experience of the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, 23 Geo. Wash. J. Int’l L. & Econ., 267-347 (1989)
  • S.A. Baker & M.D. Davis, Establishment of an Arbitral Tribunal under the UNCITRAL Rules: The Experience of the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, 23 Int’l Law., 81-135 (1989)
  • D.J. Bederman, Beneficial Ownership of International Claims, 38 Int’l & Comp. L.Q., 935-946 (1989)
  • D.J. Bederman, Contributory Fault and State Responsibility, 30 Va. J. Int’l L., 335-369 (1990)
  • D.J. Bederman, Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: The First Ten Years, 1981-1991, 88 Am. J. Int’l L., 403-405 (1994)
  • S.P. Belland, The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal: Some Reflections on Trying a Claim, 1 J. Int’l Arb., 237-253 (1984)
  • P. Bellet et al., Symposium on the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 16 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus., 667-962 (1984)
  • R.H. Berglin, Treaty Interpretation and the Impact of Contractual Choice of Forum Clauses on the Jurisdiction of International Tribunals: The Iranian Forum Clause Decisions of the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, 21 Tex. Int’l L.J., 39-63 (1985)
  • R.H. Berglin, The Iranian Forum Clause decisions of the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, 3 Arb. Int’l, 46-71 (1987)
  • K.-H. Böckstiegel, The Relevance of National Arbitration Law for Arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules, 1 J. Int’l. Arb., 223-236 (1984)
  • K.-H. Böckstiegel, Zur Bedeutung des Iran-United States Claims Tribunal für die Entwicklung des internationalen Rechts [On the Importance of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal for the Development of International Law], Festschrift der Rechtswissenschaftlichen Fakultät zur 600-Jahr – Feier der Universität zu Köln, 605-631 (1988) (Ger.)
  • K.-H. Böckstiegel, The Effectiveness of Inter-State Arbitration in Political Turmoil, 10 J. Int’l Arb., 43-50 (1993)
  • J.S. Borek, Review of Caron and Pellonpää’s UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as Interpreted and Applied, 90 Am. J. Int’l L., 529-531 (1996)
  • C. Borris, Die UNCITRAL‑Schiedsregeln in der Praxis des Iran United States Claims Tribunal [The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules in the Practice of the Iran United States Claims Tribunal], 2 Jahrbuch für die Praxis der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, 3-22 (1988) (Ger.)
  • L. Bosman, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 6 Hague Y.B. Int’l L., 239-284 (1993)
  • L. Bosman et al., The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 7 Hague Y.B. Int’l L., 289-316 (1994)
  • L. Bosman et al., The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 8 Hague Y.B. Int’l L., 171-198 (1995)
  • L. Bosman et al., The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 9 Hague Y.B. Int’l L., 191-227 (1996)
  • F.A. Boyle, International Law as a Basis for Conducting American Foreign Policy:1979-1982, 8 Yale J. World Pub. Ord., 103-155 (1981)
  • D.J. Branson, Continuous Ownership of a Claim: A Hard Case at the Iran United States Claims Tribunal makes Bad Law, 3 Arb. Int’l, 164-70 (1987)
  • R. Briner, Review of Westberg’s International Transactions and Claims Involving Government Parties – Case Law of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 9 J. Int’l Arb., 123-126 (1992)
  • R. Briner, Luncheon Talk: The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal and Disputes Involving Sovereigns, 18 Arb. Int’l, 299-303 (2002)
  • C.N. Brower, Current Developments in the Law of Expropriation and Compensation: A Preliminary Survey of Awards of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 81 Int’l Law., 639-669 (1987)
  • C.N. Brower & M.D. Davis, The Iran United States Claims Tribunal After Seven Years: A Retrospective View from the Inside, 43 Arb. J., 16-30 (1988)
  • C.N. Brower, Lessons to be drawn from the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, 9 J. Int’l Arb., 51-58 (1992)
  • C.N. Brower, Evidence Before International Tribunals: The Need for Some Standard Rules, 28 Int. Law., 47-58 (1994)
  • A.E. Brownstein, The Takings Clause and The Iranian Claims Settlement, 29 UCLA L. Rev., 984-1075 (1982)
  • M. Brunetti, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, Hague Y.B. Int’l L., 237-270 (1992)
  • M. Brunetti et al., The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 11 Hague Y.B. Int’l L., 231-257 (1999)
  • M. Brunetti, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, NAFTA Chapter 11, and the Doctrine of Indirect Expropriation, 2 Chi. J. Int’l L. no. 1, 203-212 (2001)
  • M. Brunetti, The Lex Mercatoria in Practice: The Experience of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 18 Arb. Int’l no. 4, 355-378 (2002)
  • M. Brunetti, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 15 Hague Y.B. Int’l L, 247-254 (2002)
  • S. Buchman, The Question of Iran’s Immunity: Jurisdiction Over a Foreign Sovereign, VII Brook. J. Int’l L., 41-89 (1981)
  • Bulletin of The World Peace Through, Iran-US Claims Tribunal Law Center, 18 The World Jurist nos. 5 & 6, at 8 (1981)
  • L.M. Caplan et al., International courts and tribunals, 41 Int’l Law., 291-316 (2007)
  • D.D. Caron, Liability for Transnational Pollution Arising from Offshore Oil Development: A Methodological Approach, 10 Ecology L.Q., 641-683 (1983)
  • D.D. Caron, Interim Measures of Protection: Theory and Practice in Light of the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, 46 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 466-518 (1986) 
  • D.D. Caron, The Nature of the Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal and the Evolving Structure of International Dispute Resolution, 84 Am. J. Int’l L., 104-156 (1990)
  • D.D. Caron & L.F. Reed, Post Award Proceedings Under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, 11 Arb. Int’l, 429-454 (1995)
  • D.D. Caron, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal and the Process of International Claims Resolution, 97 Am. Soc’y Int’l L., 221 (2002)
  • R. Carswell, Economic Sanctions and The Iran Experience, Foreign Aff., Winter 1981/1982, 247-265 (1981)
  • J.H. Carter, The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal: Observations on the First Year, 29 UCLA L. Rev., 1076-1103 (1982)
  • D. Charlotin, A Data Analysis of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal’s Jurisprudence – Lessons for International Dispute-Settlement Today, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 443 (September 2019)
  • F.T. Chen, The Iran‑U.S. Claims Tribunal’s Application of Commercial Law in the Economy Forms Award, 4 Chin. Y.B. Int’l L. & Aff., 137-147 (1984)
  • C. Chinkin, The Foreign Affairs Powers of The US President and the Iranian Hostages Agreement: Dames and Moore v. Regan, 32 Int’l & Comp. L. Q., 600-615 (1983)
  • B.M. Clagett, The Expropriation Issue Before the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Is “Unjust Compensation” Required by International Law or Not?, 16 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus., 813-889 (1984)
  • B.M. Clagett & D.B. Poneman, The Treatment of Economic Injury to Aliens in the Revised Restatement of Foreign Relations Law, 22 Int’l Law., 35-68 (1988)
  • H. Clark, B. Concolino and A. Morales Ramos, The Broader Legacy of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, C. Benicke & S. Huber (eds), National, International, Transnational, Harmonischer Dreiklang im Recht – Festschrift für Herbert Kronke zum 70. Geburtstag, ۷۵۳-۷۶۸ (Gieseking 2020)
  • S. Cohen et al., The Iranian Hostage Agreement Under International and United States Law, 81 Colum. L. Rev., 823-901 (1981)
  • J.G. Collier, Review of Khan’s The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 40 Int’l & Comp. L.Q., 748-749 (1991)
  • N.A. Combs, Carter, Reagan, and Khomeini: Presidential Transitions and International Law, 52 Hastings L. J., 303 (2001)
  • C. Cooker, Sancties tegen Iran. De nieuwe Sanctiewet voor het eerst toegepast [Sanctions against Iran. The new Sanctions Act Applied for the First Time], 56 Nederlands Juristenblad, 445-454 (1981) (Neth.)
  • R.L. Cove, State Responsibility for Constructive Wrongful Expulsion of Foreign Nationals (Awards 324 10199 1, 326 10913 2 and 312 11135 3), 11 Fordham Envtl. L.J., 802-838 (1988)
  • J.C. Cox, Sovereign Immunity-Iranian Immunity from Prejudgment Attachments Terminated under International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 14 Vand. J. Transnat’l L., 623-635 (1981)
  • J.R. Crook, Applicable Law in International Arbitration: The Iran U.S. Claims Tribunal Experience, 83 Am. J. Int’l L., 278-311 (1989)
  • J.R. Crook , Commentary on the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. The Application by the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, 88 Am. J. Int’l L., 193-194 (1994)
  • P. Daillier et al., Tribunal irano-américain de réclamations, XLV Annuaire français de Droit International, 516-553 (1999) (Fr.)
  • P. Daillier et al., Tribunal irano-américain de réclamations, XLVIII Annuaire français de Droit International, 407-454 (2002) (Fr.)
  • L. Fisler Damrosch, et al., Decisions of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 78 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc., 221-240 (1984)
  • K.M. Dang, Prejudgment Attachment of Frozen Iranian Assets, 69 Cal. L. Rev., 837-862 (1981)
  • M.D. Davis, Review of Westberg’s International Transactions and Claims Involving Government Parties: Case Law of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 7 Foreign Inv. L.J. (ICSID) no. 1, 286-289 (1992)
  • I.F. Dekker & N.J. Schrijver, Iran-U.S. Tribunal, Ars Aequi, 340-341 (1983)
  • G.R. Delaume, State Contracts and Transnational Arbitration, 75 Am. J. Int’l L., 784-819 (1981)
  • G.R. Delaume, Review of Toope’s Mixed International Arbitration, 26 Int. Law, 247-252 (1992)
  • J. Delbrück, Fact-Finding Before International Tribunals, 88 Am. J. Int’l L. no. 1, 191-193 (1994)
  • R. Dolzer, New Foundations of the Law of Expropriation of Alien Property, 75 Am. J. Int’l L., 553-589 (1981)
  • R. Dolzer, Indirect Expropriation of Alien Property, 1 Foreign Inv. L.J. (ICSID) no. 1, 41-65 (1986)
  • Z. Douglas, The hybrid foundations of investment treaty arbitration, 74 Brit. Y.B. Int’l L., 151-289 (2003)
  • C. Doumbia-Henry, The Limits of Jurisdiction of the Iran US Claims Tribunal: a Response to Mr Branson, 4 Arb. Int.’l, 228-239 (1988)
  • M. Doxey, Oil and Food as International Sanctions, XXVI Int’l J., 311-224 (1980-1981)
  • B.D. Dudros, The Former American Hostages’ Human Rights Claims Against Iran: Can They Be Waived?, 4 Hous. J. Int’l L., 101-131 (1981)
  • R.W. Edwards Jr., Extraterritorial Application of the S. Iranian Assets Control Regulations, 75 Am. J. Int’l L., 870-902 (1981)
  • J. Enderlein, Die Sanktionen gegen Iran auf dem Gebiet des Kapitalverkehrs [The Sanctions Against Iran in the Field of Financial Transactions], 26 Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft, 453-456 (1980) (Ger.)
  • N.E. Fagre, International Agreements: Settlement of Claims Outstanding between the United States and Iran; Algeria Declaration Concerning the Settlement of Claims by the United States and Iran (19 January 1981), 22 Harv. Int’l L.J., 443-450 (1981)
  • A. Fathipour, The Guarantee in International Transactions in 13 Legal Bulletin of the Bureau for International Legal Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1990-1991) (Far.)
  • H. Fox, Review of Lillich’s Fact-Finding before International Tribunals, 42 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. no. 4, 980-981 (1993)
  • J.D. Frey, Islamic Law and the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: The Primacy of International Law over Municipal Law, 18 Arb. Int’l, 105-123 (2002)
  • P.L. Friedman & C.A. Wilson, Representing Foreign Clients in Civil Discovery and Grand Jury Proceedings, 26 Va. J. Int’l L., 327-413 (1986)
  • A.K. Friedrich, Wirtschaft als Waffe – Gedanken anläßlich der Iran-Sanktionen [Economy as a Weapon – Thoughts on Iran’s Sanctions], 33 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2620-2622 (1980) (Ger.)
  • C.I. Gable Jr., Standby Letters of Credit: Nomenclature has confounded analysis, 12 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus., 903-945 (1980)
  • E. Gaillard, L’interdiction de se contredire au détriment d’autrui comme principe général du droit du commerce international (le principe de l’estoppel dans quelques sentences arbitrales récentes), [The Rule Against Inconsistent Behavior to the Detriment of Another as a General Principle of International Commercial Law (Estoppel As Applied in Some Recent Arbitral Awards)] 2 Rev. Arb., 241-258 (1985) (Fr.)
  • P.B. Gann, Compensation Standard for Expropriation, 23 Colum. J. Transnat’l L., 615-653 (1985)
  • A.L. George, Changed Circumstances and The Iranian Claims Arbitration: Applications to Forum Selection Clauses and Frustration of Contract, 16 Geo. Wash. J. Int’l L. & Econ., 335-376 (1982)
  • F. Gianviti, Le blocage des avoirs officiels iraniens par les Etats-Unis (executive ordre du 14 novembre 1979) [The Freezing of Official Iranian Assets by the United States (Executive Order of November 14, 1979), Revue Critique de Droit International (RCDI), 279-303 (1980) (Fr.)
  • C.S. Gibson & C.R. Drahozal, Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Precedent in Investor-State Arbitration, 23 J. Int’l. Arb., 521-546 (2006)
  • K. Gillespie, US Corporations and Iran at The Hague, 44 Middle East J., 18-36 (1990) 
  • J. Gold, The Fund Agreement in the Courts‑XIX, 31 IMF Staff Papers no. 1, 179-233 (1984)
  • J. Gold, The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal and the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, 18 Geo. Wash. J. Int’l L. & Econ., 537-579 (1985)
  • J. Gold, The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal and the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, 3 IMF, 289-333 (1986)
  • J.M. Goldklang, Review of Lillich’s Iran-United States Tribunal, 1981-1983, 81 Am. J. Int’l L., 307-312 (1987)
  • R. Goode, Abstract Payment Undertakings in International Transactions, 22 Brook. J. Int’l L. 1-25 (1996)
  • E. Gordon, The Blocking of Iranian Assets, 14 Int’l Law., 659-688 (1980)
  • E. Gordon & C. Lichtenstein, The Decision to Block Iranian Assets-Reexamined, 16 Int’l Law., 161-186 (1982)
  • K. Grzybowski, The Regime of Diplomacy and The Tehran Hostages, 30 Int’l & Comp. L.Q., 42-58 (1981)
  • D. Hagen-Egas Repárez, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 4 Hague Y.B. Int’l L., 281-331 (1991)
  • N. Haghshenas-Kashani, The planned Diversion of the Arvand Roud Waterway – Its Implications in International Law, 12 Legal Bulletin of the Bureau for International Legal Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1990) (Far.)
  • W.A. Hamel, De Procedure voor het Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal [The Procedure before the Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal], 2 Tijdschrift voor Arbitrage, 34-41 (1983) (Neth.)
  • W.A. Hamel, Het Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal [The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal], 34 Ars Aequi, 12-16 (1985) (Neth.)
  • W.A. Hamel, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 1 Hague Y.B. Int’l L., 358-462 (1988)
  • W.A. Hamel, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 2 Hague Y.B. Int’l L., 274-348 (1989)
  • W.A. Hamel, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 3 Hague Y.B. Int’l L., 211-280 (1990)
  • G. Hanessian, “General Principles of Law” in the Iran U.S. Claims Tribunal, 27 Colum. J. Transnat’l L., 309-352 (1989)
  • L. Hardenberg, The Awards of the Iran US Claims Tribunal. Seen in connection with the Law of the Netherlands, 12 Int’l Bus. Law., 337-340 (1984)
  • L. Hardenberg, Awards of the Iran United States Claims Tribunal Considered from the Point of View of Netherlands Law, 6 Nederlands Juristenblad (NJ), 167-172 (1984) (Neth.)
  • V. Heiskanen, The contribution of the Iran-United States claims tribunal to the development of the doctrine of indirect expropriation, International Law FORUM du droit international v. 5, no. 3, 176-187 (2003)
  • J.E. Hoffman Jr., The Iranian Asset Negotiations, 17 Vand. J. Transnat’l L., 47-57 (1984)
  • H.M. Holtzmann, The American Arbitrators’ Song, The Hague, 7 Arb. Int’l, 76 (1991)
  • H.M. Holtzmann, Disputes Concerning the Termination of Joint Ventures: Lessons from Awards of the Iran-US Claims Tribunal, 9 Arb. Int’l, 103-112 (1993)
  • H.M. Holtzmann, Streamlining Arbitral Proceedings: Some Techniques of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 11 Arb. Int’l, 39-50 (1995)
  • C.S. Howard, Implications of the Iranian Assets Case for American Business, 16 Int’l Law., 128-134 (1982)
  • P. Jackson & C. Montagu, The U.S.-Iran Asset Saga, 3 Int’l Fin L. Rev., 9-14 (1982)
  • A. Jeffery, The American Hostages in Tehran: The I.C.J. and The Legality of Rescue Missions, 30 Int’l & Comp. L.Q., 717-729 (1981)
  • P. Juillard, Le rôle joué par la République Populaire et Démocratique d’Algérie dans le règlement du contentieux entre les Etats Unis d’Amérique et la République Islamique d’Iran [The Role Played by the People’s and Democratic Republic of Algeria in the Settlement of the Dispute Between the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran], 27 Annuaire Francais de Droit International (AFDI), 19-44 (1981) (Fr.)
  • P.J. Kaleta, Prejudgment Attachment of Iranian Assets Behring International, Inc. v. Imperial Iranian Air Force, 12 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus., 1001-1022 (1980)
  • S.K. Khalilian, Controversial Theory of Frustration Before the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, 7 J. Int’l Arb., 5-24 (1990)
  • S.K. Khalilian, The Place of Discounted Cash Flow in International Commercial Arbitration: Awards by Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 8 J. Int’l Arb., 31-50 (1991)
  • H. Khaza’i, A Brief Study of the Legal Concept of the “Joint Venture” in United States and International Law, 13 Legal Bulletin of the Bureau for International Legal Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1990-1991) (Far.)
  • R.D.A. Knutson, The Interpretation of Arbitral Awards When is a Final Award not Final?, 11 J. Int’l. Arb., 99-109 (1994)
  • D.J. Kravet, Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States AWD 382-B1-FT, 31 August 1988, 83 Am. J. Int’l L. (ASIL) no. 1, 103-106 (1989)
  • T. Kuokkanen, Todistelusta kaksoiskansalaisjutuissa Iranin-Yhdysvaltain vä Litystuomiois-tuimessa [Dual Nationality Cases in Practice at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal], 6 Lakimies, 873-888 (1993) (Fin.)
  • G. Lagergren, Five Important Cases on Nationalization of Foreign Property decided by the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, Raoul Wallenberg Inst. Hum. Rts. L. Rep. no. 5, 5-56 (1988)
  • G. Lagergren, Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal, 13 Dalhousie L.J., 505-519 (1990)
  • W.T. Lake & J.T. Dana, Judicial Review of Awards of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Are the Tribunal’s Awards Dutch? 16 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus., 755-812 (1984)
  • E. Lauterpacht, Issues of Compensation and Nationality in the Taking of Energy Investments, 8 J. Energy Nat. Resources & Envtl. L., 241-250 (1990)
  • E. Lauterpacht, Security of Investment Abroad ‑ Recent Arbitral and Judicial Developments, Principally on the Question of Compensation, International Bar Association Series. Energy Law ’90, 471-481 (1990)
  • E.R. Leahy, Claims Tribunal for Iranian/American Disputes Requires Change in Litigating Style, 10 Litig. News, 3-9 (1984)
  • T.W. Lee, The Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal and the Questions of the Nationality of the Claimants and Compensation for Expropriation, 4 Chin. Y.B. Int’l L. & Aff., 129-136 (1984)
  • M.N. Leich, The Proposed Iran Claims Act of the United States, 77 Am. J. Int’l L., 166-167 (1983)
  • M.N. Leich, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 77 Am. J. Int’l L., 913-914 (1983)
  • B. Leurent, Problèmes soulevés par les demandes des doubles nationaux devant le Tribunal des différends irano-américains [Issues Raised by Dual Nationals’ Claims in the Iran-US Claims Tribunal], 74 Revue Critique de Droit International Privé (RCDIP), 274-315 (1985) (Fr.)
  • R.P. Lewis, What Goes Around Comes Around: Can Iran Enforce Awards of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal in the United States?, 26 Colum. J. Transnat’l L., 515-552 (1988)
  • W.C. Lieblich, Determinations by International Tribunals of the Economic Value of Expropriated Enterprises, 7 J. Int’l Arb., 37-76 (1990)
  • W.C. Lieblich, Determining the Economic Value of Expropriated Income Producing Property in International Arbitration, 8 J. Int’l Arb., 59-80 (1991)
  • R.B. Lillich & B.H. Weston, Lump Sum Agreements: Their Continuing Contribution to the Law of International Claims, 82 Am. J. Int’l L., 69-80 (1988)
  • A.F. Lowenfeld, The U.S.‑Iranian Dispute Settlement Accords: An Arbitrator looks at the Prospects for Arbitration, 36 Arb. J., 3-13 (1981)
  • A.F. Lowenfeld, The U.S./Iran Hostage Settlement, 75 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc., 239-242 (1981)
  • A.F. Lowenfeld, The Iran U.S. Claims Tribunal: An Interim Appraisal, 38 Arb. J., 14-23 (1983)
  • P.E. Mahoney, The Standing of Dual Nationals Before the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, 24 Va. J. Int’l L., 695-728 (1984)
  • F.A. Mann, State Contracts and International Arbitration, 39 Brit. Yb. Int’l L., 1 (1967) 
  • R.L. Marks & J.C. Grabow, The President’s Foreign Economic Powers After Dames & Moore v. Regan: Legislation by Acquiescence, 68 Cornell L. Rev., 68-103 (1982)
  • A.Z. Marossi, Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Claims, Counterclaims, Dual Nationality, and Enforcement, 23 J. Int’l. Arb., 493-519 (2006)
  • A.Z. Marossi, Shifting the Burden of Proof in the Practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 28 J. Int’l. Arb., 427 (2011)
  • C. Massaroni, The United States‑Iran Hostage Agreement: A Study in Presidential Powers, 15 Cornell Int’l L. J., 150-201 (1982)
  • D.S. Mathias, The Weighing of Evidence in a Dual National Case at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal A Case Comment (Nazari and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran [Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, Award No. 559-221-1, 24 August 1994]), 26 Neth. Y.B. Int’l L., 171-189 (1995)
  • M.P. McCabe, Arbitral Discovery and the Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal Experience, 20 Int’l Law., 499-534 (1986)
  • P. McGarvey-Rosendahl, A New Approach to Dual Nationality, 8 Hous. J. Int’l L., 305-326 (1986)
  • R.M. McGreevey, The Iranian Crisis and U.S. Law, 2 Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus., 384-454 (1980)
  • I. Minta, The Code of Conduct on TNCs: In the Twilight Zone of International Law, 25 CTC Rep., 29-37 (1998)
  • M. Samsami Mohajer, A Report on Awards Issued by the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, Legal Bull. Bureau Int’l Legal S. I.R.I. no. 1, Winter 1984-1985
  • M. Samsami Mohajer, Withdrawal of Claims, Legal Bull. Bureau Int’l Legal S. I.R.I. no. 1, Winter 1984-1985
  • R.M. Mosk, Lessons from The Hague‑An Update on the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, 14 Pepp. L. Rev., 819-825 (1987)
  • R.M. Mosk, The Role of Party‑Appointed Arbitrators in International Arbitration: The Experience of the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, 1 Transnat’l Law., 253-270 (1988)
  • R.M. Mosk et al., Individual Review of International Transactions and Claims Involving Government Parties: Case Law of the Iran-US Claims Tribunal, 24 Vand. J. Transnat’l L., 587-609 (1991)
  • A. Mouri, Aspects of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 2 Asian Y.B. Int’l L., 61-85 (1992)
  • A. Mouri, Striking a Balance between the Finality of Awards and The Right to a Fair Judgment: What is the Contribution of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal?, IV Fin Y.B. Int’l. L., 1-97 (1993)
  • A. Mouri, Treatment of the Rules of the International Law of Money by the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 3 Asian Y.B. Int’l L., 71-110 (1993)
  • V. P. Nanda, Iran-United States Litigation, Proceedings of the 77th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, American Society of International Law, 3-26 (1983)
  • S.C. Neff, Review of Aldrich’s Jurisprudence of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 46 Int’l & Comp. L.Q., 971-972 (1998)
  • L.W. Newman, Enforcement of Judgments, 17 Vand. J. Transnat’l L., 77-91 (1984)
  • P.M. Norton, A Law of the Future or a Law of the Past? Modern Tribunals and the International Law of Expropriation, 85 Am. J. Int’l L., 474-505 (1991)
  • J.J. Norton & M.H. Collins, Reflections on the Iranian Hostage Settlement, 67 A.B.A J., 236-239 (1981)
  • J.S. Oshinsky, Dames & Moore v. Regan: The Binding Effect of The Executive Agreement Concluded During the International Dispute to Resolve the Hostage Crises, 16 Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev., 401-426 (1982)
  • R.B. Owen, The U.S./Iran Hostage Settlement, 75 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc., 236-239 (1981)
  • P.W.A, The U.S.-Iran Accords and the Taking Clause of the Fifth Amendment, 68 Va. L. Rev., 1537-1567 (1982)
  • W.W. Park, Judicial Controls in the Arbitral Process, 5 Arb. Int’l, 230-279 (1989)
  • M. Pellonpää, Iranin‑Yhdysvaltain välitystuomi­oistuin [The Iran United States Claims Tribunal], 83 Lakimies, 525-549 (1985) (Fin.)
  • M. Pellonpää, Valuation of Expropriated or Nationalized Property in International Arbitral Practice of Recent Years, 5 Publications of the Finnish Branch of the International Law Association, 145-168 (1987)
  • M. Pellonpää & M. Fitzmaurice, Taking of Property in the Practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 19 Neth. Y.B. Int’l L., 53-187 (1988)
  • H. Piran, Indirect expropriation in the case law of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 6 Fin. Y.B. Int’l. L., 140-247 (1995)
  • M. Popper, Hague Tribunal Decides Cases on Merits Criteria for Practical Proof of Corporate Nationality, Int’l Fin. L. Rev., 29 (1983)
  • J. Priestley, International Commercial Arbitration, Aus. B. Rev., 201-221 (1985)
  • S. Rabiee, The decisions of the Iran-United States claims tribunal in expulsion cases: a critique, 7 Fin Y.B. Int’l. L, 426-448 (1996)
  • L. Radicati di Brozolo, La soluzione delle controversie tra stati e stranieri mediante accordo internazionale: Gli accordi tra Stati Uniti ed Iran [The Settlement of Disputes Between States and Foreigners by International Agreement: The Agreements Between the United States and Iran], 65 Rivista di Diritto Internazionale (RDI), 299-343 (1982) (It.)
  • J.M. Redwine, The Effect of Duress on the Iranian Hostage Settlement Agreement, 14 Vand. J. Transnat’l L., 847-890 (1981)
  • D.R. Robinson, Recent Developments at the Iran‑United States Claims Tribunal, 17 Int’l Law., 661-667 (1983)
  • A. Root, Settlement of The Iranian Hostage Crisis: An Exercise of Constitutional and Statutory Prerogative in Foreign Affairs, 13 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol., 993-1048 (1980)
  • S.H. Safa’i, The Concept of Gross Negligence in Connection with Non-Responsibility Clauses, 4 Legal Bull. Bureau Int’l Legal S. I.R.I. (1985-1986) (Far.)
  • S.H. Safa’i, Restrictions on the Property Rights of Foreigners under Iranian Law, 11 Legal Bull. Bureau Int’l Legal S. I.R.I. (1989-1990) (Far.)
  • S.H. Safa’i, Summary of Activities of the Iran-Unit-ed States Claims Tribunal in The Hague Through 22 September 1989, 10 Legal Bull. Bureau Int’l Legal S. I.R.I., (1989-1990) (Far.)
  • O. Sandrock, Are Disputes Over the Application of Article VIII, Section 2(b) of the IMF Treaty Arbitrable?, 23 Int. Law., 933-950 (1989)
  • M. Schachter, Prejudgment Attachment of Iranian Assets in the United States: Waiving Sovereign Immunity Behring Int’l, Inc. v. Imperial Iranian Air Force, 13 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol., 675-703 (1980)
  • R.A. Schütze, The Precedential Effect of Arbitration Decisions, 11 J. Int’l. Arb, 69-75 (1994)
  • S.M. Schwebel, The Validity of an Arbitral Award Rendered by a Truncated Tribunal, 4 Asian Pac. L. Rev., 1-20 (1995)
  • S.M. Schwebel & R. Teitelbaum, The latest Award from the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: the Line between Approximation of Damages and Ruling ex aequo et bono, 109 Am. J. Int’l L., 369-378 (2015)
  • H.C.I. Seidl-Hohenveldern, Subrogation under the Miga Convention, 2 Foreign Inv. L.J. (ICSID) no. 1, 111-121 (1987)
  • I. Seidl-Hohenveldern, Article VIII, Section 2(b) of the IMF Articles of Agreement and Public Policy, 23 Int. Law., 957-962 (1989)
  • I. Seidl-Hohenveldern, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Controversies, Cases and Contribution, 34 Ger. Y.B. Int’l L., 591-593 (1991)
  • J. Seifi, Procedural Remedies against Awards of Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 8 Arb. Int’l, 41-72 (1992)
  • J. Seifi, State Responsibility for Failure to Enforce Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Awards by the Respective National Courts International Character and Non-Review – Ability of the Awards Reconfirmed, 16 J. Int’l Arb, 5-27 (1993)
  • J.M. Selby & D.P. Steward, Practical Aspects of Arbitrating Claims Before the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, 18 Int’l Law., 211-244 (1984)
  • J.M. Selby, State Responsibility and The Iran-United Claims Tribunal, 83 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc., 240-246 (1989)
  • H.J. Shalvarjian & H.M. Richter, Outline of Settling Claims: The Iranian Experience, 9 Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev., 471-479 (1986)
  • A. Shirazi, A Brief Review of the Theory of Unjust Enrichment in Iranian, United States and International Law, in: 5 Legal Bull. Bureau Int’l Legal S. I.R.I. (1986) (Far.)
  • A. Shirazi, Iran‑U.S. Claims Tribunal: An Unfair International Award on the Basis of Unjust Enrichment, 5 J. Int’l Arb., 111-126 (1988)
  • R.J.H. Smits, De Akkoorden van Algiers [The Algiers Accords], 26 Nederlands Juristenblad, 745-760 (1982) (Neth.)
  • R.J.H. Smits, Enige aspecten van de Amerikaans-Iraanse arbitrage in Den Haag [Some Aspects of the US-Iranian Arbitration in The Hague], 2 Tijdschrift voor Arbitrage, 42-54 (1983) (Neth.)
  • M.A. Solhchi, The Validity of Truncated Tribunal Proceedings and Awards, 9 Arb. Int’l, 303-316 (1993)
  • T.L. Stein, Jurisprudence and Jurists’ Prudence: The Iranian Forum Clause Decisions of the Iran U.S. Claims Tribunal, 78 Am. J. Int’l L., 1-52 (1984)
  • B. Stern, A propos d’une décision du Tribunal des différends irano-américains (On a Decision of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal), 28 Journal du Droit International, 426-453 (1982) (Fr.)
  • B. Stern, Changements de circonstances et clauses d’élection de for devant le Tribunal des différends irano-américains [Change of Circumstances and Choice of Court Clauses in the Iran-American Claims Tribunal], XXIX Annuaire Français de Droit International (AFDI), 313-334 (1983) (Fr.)
  • B. Stern, Les questions de nationalité des personnes physiques et de nationalité et de contrôle des personnes morales devant le Tribunal des différends irano – américains [Issues of Nationality of Natural Persons and Nationality and Control of Legal Persons Before the Iran-American Claims Tribunal], 30 Annuaire Français de Droit International (AFDI), 425-445 (1984) (Fr.)
  • D.P. Stewart & L.B. Sherman, Developments at the Iran United States Claims Tribunal 1981-1983, 24 Va. J. Int’l L., 1-53 (1983)
  • D.P. Stewart, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: A Review of Developments 1983-84, 16 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus., 677-753 (1984)
  • M. Straus, Causation as an Element of State Responsibility, 16 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus., 893-926 (1984)
  • M. Straus, The Practice of the Iran‑U.S. Claims Tribunal in Receiving Evidence from Parties and from Experts, 3 J. Int’l Arb., 57-69 (1986)
  • E. Suy, Settling U.S. Claims Against Iran Through Arbitration, 29 Am. J. Comp. L., 523-529 (1981)
  • Swan Cutler, Symposium on the Settlement with Iran, 13 Lawyer of Americas, U. Miami J. Int’l L. no. 1 (1981)
  • S.R. Swanson, Iran‑U.S. Claims Tribunal: A Policy Analysis of the Expropriation Case, 18 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L., 307-360 (1986)
  • K. T. Takamaa, Forum Selection Clauses in International Contracts: The Practice of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, 7 Publication of the Finnish Branch of the International Law Association, 260-302
  • R. Teitelbaum, Challenges of Arbitrators at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal— Defining the Role of the Appointing Authority, J. Int’l Arb, 547 (2006)
  • J.S. Telpner, Dames & Moore v. Regan: Rethinking the Fifth Amendment Implications of the Iranian Hostage Agreement, 68 Iowa L. Rev., 123-158 (1982)
  • J.P. Terry, The Iranian Hostages Crisis: International Law & United States Policy, XXXII JAG J., 31-79 (1982)
  • A.J. van den Berg, Proposed Dutch Law on the Iran‑US Claims Settlement Declaration. A Reaction to Mr. Hardenberg’s Article, Int’l Bus. Law., 341-344 (1984)
  • A.J. van den Berg, Recent Enforcement Problems Under the New York and ICSID Conventions, 5 Arb. Int’l, 2-20 (1989)
  • H.J. van der Vaart, Standby Letters of Credit and the Problem of Bad Faith Calls, 8 Yale J. World Pub. Ord., 36-61 (1981)
  • H. van Houtte, Treaty Protection Against Economic Sanctions, Revue Belge de Droit International, 34-36 (1984-1985)
  • J.M. Vogelson et al, American Hostages in Iran, The Conduct of a Crisis, 20 Int’l Law., 759-762 (1986)
  • R.B. von Mehren, The Iran‑U.S.A. Arbitral Tribunal, 31 Am. J. Comp. L., 713-730 (1983)
  • J.R.G. Weeramantry, Estoppel and the Preclusive Effects of Inconsistent Statements and Conduct: The Practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 27 Neth. Y.B. Int’l L., 113-141 (1996)
  • G. Wegen, Discontinuance of International Proceedings: The Hostage Case, 76 Am. J. Int’l L. no. 4, 717-736 (1982)
  • J.A. Westberg, The Applicable Law Issue in International Business Transactions with Government Parties: Rulings of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 2 Foreign Inv.
  1. J. (ICSID) no. 2, 473-494 (1987)
  • J.A. Westberg, Contract Excuse in International Business Transactions: Awards of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 4 Foreign Inv. L.J. (ICSID) no. 2, 215-240 (1989)
  • J.A. Westberg, Compensation in Cases of Expropriation and Nationalization: Awards of the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, 5 Foreign Inv. L.J. (ICSID) no. 2, 256-291 (1990)
  • J.A. Westberg, International Transactions and Claims Involving Government Parties: Case Law of the Iran-US Claims Tribunal, Int’l Law Inst., 392 (1991)
  • J.A. Westberg & B.P. Marchais, General Principles Governing Foreign Investment as Articulated in Recent International Tribunal Awards and Writings of Publicists, 7 Foreign Inv. L.J. (ICSID) no. 2, 453-496 (1992)
  • J.A. Westberg, Applicable law, expropriatory takings and compensation in cases of expropriation: ICSID and Iran-United-States Claims Tribunal case law compared, 8 Foreign Inv. L. J. (ICSID) no. 1, 1-28 (1993)
  • J.A. Westberg, Review of Baker and Davis ‘The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules in Practice: The Experience of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal’, ۹ Foreign Inv. L., 363-365 (1994)
  • J.A. Westberg, Review of Brower & Brueschke’s The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 13 Foreign Inv. L.J. (ICSID), 363-365 (1998)
  • J.G. Wetter, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 67 Svensk Juristtidning (SJ), 193-213 (1982) (Se.)
  • J.G. Wetter, Interest as an Element of Damages in the Arbitral Process, Int’l Fin. L. Rev., 20-23 (1986)
  • J.G. Wetter, Review of Schwebel’s International Arbitration: Three Salient Problems, 3 Arb. Int’l, 271-276 (1987)
  • G. White, International Transactions and Claims Involving Government Parties: Case Law of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 9 Arb. Int’l, 226-230 (1993)
  • G. White, Review of Avanessians Iran-United States Claims Tribunal in Action, 11 Arb. Int’l, 101-103 (1995)
  • P. Winship & J.C. Thompson, Review of Westberg International Transactions and Claims Involving Government Parties: Case Law of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 27 Int’l Law, 246-250 (1993)
  • N. Wühler, Revolution und Verträge zwischen Privaten und Staaten – Die Rechtsprechung des Iran-United States Claims Tribunal [Revolution and Private-State Contracts – The Case Law of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal], 3 Jahrbuch für die Praxis der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (JPS), 160-177 (1989) (Ger.)
  • N. Wühler, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. Ten Years of Arbitration at Work, 8 J. Int’l Arb., 5-16 (1991)
  • N.G. Ziadé, Selective Bibliography on the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, 2 Foreign Inv. L. J. (ICSID) no. 2, 534-546 (1987)
  • L.Y. Zielinski, Property Rights in Treaty Cases: Lessons for Investor-State Arbitration from Case A15 (II:A) of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, J. Int’l Arb., ۳۹۵ (۲۰۲۱)
  • M.P. Zimmett, Standby Letters of Credit in the Iran Litigation: Two Hundred Problems in Search of a Solution, 16 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus., 927-962 (1984)

یادداشت‌های آرا

  • Jeffrey J. Clark, International Arbitration—Foreign Arbitral Awards—Algerian Accords Represent an “Agreement In Writing” for Purposes of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Ministry of Defense of The Islamic Republic Of Iran v. Gould, Inc., 887 F.2d 1357 (9th Cir. 1989), 14 Suffolk Transnat’l L.J. 658 (1991)
  • John R. Cooke, Dames & Moore v. Regan, Rights in Conflict: the Fifth Amendment Held Hostage, 31 Am. U. L. Rev. 345 (1982)
  • John R. Crook, U.S. Supreme Court Finds Iran Immune In Case Involving Terrorism Claims and the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, 103 Am. J. Int’l L. 581 (2009)
  • Rebecca A. D’Arcy, The Legacy of Dames & Moore v. Regan: The Twilight Zone of Concurrent Authority Between the Executive and Congress and a Proposal for a Judicially Manageable Nondelegation Doctrine, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 291 (2003)
  • Lee R. Marks and John C. Grabow, The President’s Foreign Economic Powers After Dames & Moore v. Regan: Legislation By Acquiescence, 68 Cornell L. Rev. 68 (1982)
  • David E. McCauley, Constitutional Law—Just Compensation Clause—Is The Federal Government’s Assessment of a User Fee on an Award Entered by the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal an Unconstitutional Taking Without Just Compensation?, United States v. Sperry Corporation, 14 Suffolk Transnat’l L.J. 592 (1991)
  • Phillip R. Trimble, Foreign Policy Frustrated—Dames & Moore, Claims Court Jurisdiction and a New Raid on the Treasury, 84 Colum. L. Rev. 317 (1984)
  • Peter D. Trooboff and Rose C. Chan, Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal—Deduction of Percentage of Award by U.S. Government—Taking Without Just Compensation—Retroactive Application and Due Process, United States v. Sperry Corp., 84 Am. J. Int’l L. 554 (1990)

متفرقه (شامل پست‌های وبلاگ و غیره)

  • Bridie McAsey, ‘The Recent Settlement at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Historical Context, Implications, and the Future’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (March 18 and 21, 2016) available at <https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2016/03/18/the-recent-settlement-at- the-iran-united-states-claims-tribunal-historical-context-implications-and-the-future- part-i >. (Parts I and II published separately)